HERI ATMOKO ( HAO )

Sunday, February 21, 2016

ST REGIS PROJECT - CAPITAL PLACE

ST REGIS JAKARTA

PROJECT WILL COMPLETE BY
JUNE 30, 2015 !!!!

Contents

A.Project Update

A.1 Scope of Main Contractor

A.2 Site Progress Photograph

A.3 Piling Work Progress

A.4 Main Contract Tender

A.5 Mock Up

A.6 Tender Schedule for All Packages

A.7 Project Milestone

A.8 Design Status

A.9 Site Logistic Layout Plan

CONTENTS

A.Permit and Licenses

B.1 Achievement & Target

B.2 Back Access Road C.1 Loan agreement

A. PROJECT UPDATE

ST REGIS JAKARTA - section A

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.1. SCOPE OF MAIN CONTRACTOR

Main Contract Works:

●Fixed price lump sum contract

●Mock up room by main contractor

●Earthworks, concrete works, structural steel work, roofing, waterproofing, block work and basic finishes.

●MEP , Facade and all other packages also by main contractor as long as pricing is competitive.

●Coordinate the overlap piling contract works (ACSET)

●Coordinate ground anchor installation during basement excavation (VSL)

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.2. SITE PROGRESS PHOTOGRAPHS AS OF 22 APRIL 2013

PILING ACTIVITY ON SITE

ST REGIS JAKARTA

‘D’ wall panel fabrication in progress

Rebar stock yard

‘View of Site From Top of Ramp

‘View of Site From Jl. Gatot Soebroto side

ST REGIS JAKARTA

Service crane supporting concreting activities

Sludge management hindred by rainfall impact and upon site operation

‘D’ wall excavation in progress along Jl. Gatot Soebroto side

‘D ‘ wall excavation in progress along Idola Tunggal side

ZONING AREA

A.3 PILE ZONING PLAN

OFFICE

HOTEL

PODIUM

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.3 PILING WORK PROGRESS AS OF 24 APRIL 2013

BORED PILE

AREA	Qty Plan (pile)	Done	Remaining	Status Ahead (+) Behind (-) (Days)	Target Completion	Contract Completion Date
ZONE - 1 (OFFICE)	414	314	100	+44	15 May 2013	28 June 2013
ZONE - 2 (PODIUM)	193	28	165	-8	06 July 2013
ZONE - 3 (HOTEL)	194	24	170	+15	13 June 2013
TOTAL	801	366	435	-8	06 July 2013

D-WALL

AREA

Qty Plan (panel)

Done

Remaining

Status

Ahead (+)

Behind (-)
(Days)

Target Completion

Contract Completion Date

ZONE - 1 (OFFICE)

+45

14 May 2013

28 June 2013

ZONE - 2 (PODIUM)

-10

08 July 2013

ZONE - 3 (HOTEL)

+15

13 June 2013

TOTAL

-10

08 Juli 2013

= NEW PILE

= EXISTING PILE

PILING LAYOUT PLAN

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.4 MAIN CONTRACT TENDER

#1 Submission Participants

(Opened 11 March 2013)

1.PT. Balfour Beatty Sakti

2.Grocon (JV) PT. Nusa Raya Cipta

3.PT. Leighton Contractor Indonesia

4.PT. Nusa Konstruksi Engineering

5.PT. SsangYong

6.PT. Tata Mulia Nusantara Indah

#2 Submission Participants

(Opened 8 April 2013)

7.PT. Balfour Beatty Sakti

8.Grocon (JV) PT. Nusa Raya Cipta

9.PT. Leighton Contractor Indonesia

10.PT. Nusa Konstruksi Engineering

11.PT. SsangYong

12.PT.Tata Mulia Nusantara Indah (Declined)

#3 Submission Participants

(Opened 22 April 2013) – 3 Best Price

1.Grocon (JV) PT. Nusa Raya Cipta

2.PT. Nusa Konstruksi Engineering

3.PT. SsangYong

Planned

Main Contract Award

30 April 2013

C O N F I D E N T I A L

ST REGIS JAKARTA

•Plywood Mock Up Study was completed on Oct 2012, inspected on 10 Dec 2012 and demolished on Jan 15 2013

•Real Mock Up will be built

by Main Contractor and

complete by 30 June 2013

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.5 MOCK UP

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.6 TENDER SCHEDULE FOR ALL PACKAGES

TENDER SCHEDULE

No.	Tender Name	Start	Finish
1	Demolition Work	Done	09 Jun '12
2	Ground Anchor and Soil Nailing Work	Done	08 Sep '12
3	Bore Pile and Retaining Wall Work	Done2	28 Nov '12
4	Main Contract	11 Jan '13	30 Apr '13
5	Façade (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	11 Apr '13	02 Jul '13
6	MEP (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	4 May ’13	27 Aug‘13
7	Associated equipment with MEP (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	28 Apr ’13	31 Mar ‘14
8	Building Maintenance Unit (Gondola) (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	23 Sep '13	03 Jan '14
9	Interior Works of Hotel (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	13 Dec '13	22 Aug '14
10	Interior works Office (part of Main Contract scope if price competitive)	15 Apr '14	15 Aug '14

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.7 PROJECT MILESTONES



No.	Milestones	Date
1	LoA Main Contractor	30 Apr 2013
2	Completion of piling works zone 1 (Office Tower area)	15 May 2013
3	Excavation commencement	21 May 2013
4	Hand over all area from piling contractor	28 Jun 2013
5	Structure Ground Floor Office Tower complete	28 Dec 2013
6	Topping off Hotel	30 Jun 2014
7	PLN energized	10 Aug 2014
8	Completion of facade works - Hotel	24 Aug 2014
9	Topping off Office Tower	10 Dec 2014
10	Partial Taking Over BOH (on Bsmt 1 & Bsmt 2)	30 Jan 2015
11	Partial Taking Over FOH (on Bsmt 1 M for staff & lev.3 for GM)	30 Jan 2015
12	Completion of facade works - Office Tower	06 Feb 2015
13	Project Completion	30 Jun 2015

CONSULTANT CONCEPT SCHEMATIC DESIGN TENDER TARGET

DEV DOC DATE

a.PCPA (Architect) √ √ √

b. Airmas Asri (Architect) √ √ √ √ 5/2/13

c. Beca MEP/PT.BK √ √ √ √ 4/5/13

d. Beca Structure/Gistama √ √ √ √ 5/2/13

e. Champalimaud (ID) √ √ progress 14/1/13

f. Bensley Design (Landscape) progress 23/10/13

g. CCW (Acoustic) √ √ √ √ 23/11/13

h. BSLD (Lighting) √ √ √ √ 18/11/13

ii.PT. LSI (QS) √ √ √ progress

j. DSI-TTW (Façade) √ √ √ √ 29/4/13

k. PT. Geo Optima (Geotech) √ √ √

l. CKP Hospitality (Kitchen) √ progress 26/12/13

m. Tess Neoh (SPA) √ √ progress

n. PT. Velo (IT) √ progress 24/1/14

o. PT. Wiragardha (Security & FLS) √ √ progress 15/11/13

p. PT. Airkon Pratama (Greenship) √ √ progress

q. VADI (Signage) progress 24/3/14

r. CPP (Wind Tunnel) √ √ √ √

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.8 DESIGN STATUS

A.9 SITE LOGISTIC LAYOUT PLAN

JL. GATOT SOEBROTO

GRU & CM Site Office

Mock Up Location

Main Con Site Office

Ramp to site offices

Car park

VIP Car park

Motorcycle park

PT. Acset site office

Car park

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.9 GRU AND CM SITE OFFICE

2nd Floor

GRU Site Office

1st Floor

CM Site Office

ST REGIS JAKARTA

A.10 PROJECT COST UPDATE

Based on DLS cost plan Dec 2012 with zero amount contingency.

PERMITS - section B

B. PERMITS AND LICENSES

ST REGIS JAKARTA

B.1 PERMITS AND LICENSES ACHIEVEMENT AND TARGET

Status Completion

KKOP Approved 16/03/2012

Plot Ratio Increment Approved 24/07/2012

SIPPT Approved 23/08/2012

Block Plan Approved 26/12/2012

TPAK Approved 21/11/2012

TPKB1 Approved 19/12/2012

TPKB 2 Approved 27/02/2013

Ijin Pondasi (IP) Target Approval 15/05/2013

TPIB Target Approval 26/06/2013

Ijin Struktur Menyeluruh Target Approval 15/07/2013

AMDAL Target Approval 15/08/2013

PKS (SIPPT Compliance) Target Approval 15/08/2013

IMB Target Approval 30/08/2013

Pertelaan Gov Approval Target Approval 30/09/2014

SLF Target Approval 30/03/2015

Strata Title Certificate Target Approval 30/06/2015

Notes:

1. New regulation requires approval of KA-ANDAL in order to have Ijin Pondasi

2. PKS is a new authority requirement.

Meeting Rooms

Hotel Block

BACK ACCESS ROAD PROGRESS

B.2 BACK ACESS ROAD

WIDYA CHANDRA

Complex

KRUKUT RIVER

SATRIA MANDALA

MUSEUM Complex

BACK ACCESS

SIDE ACCESS

JL. GATOT SOEBROTO

ST REGIS JAKARTA

BACK ACCESS MAP

Saturday, February 20, 2016

THE PRIORITIES IN THE CONTRACT BETWEEN SPEC, DRAWING AND BQ

1) Lump Sum Contracts

Generally SRJ Contracts are Lump Sum which means the contract sum is based on the requirements of the specs and the drawings

The Drawings and specs are to be complied with (the BQ’s are just a tool for use in calculating monthly progress payments and for unit rates to be applied to variations)

The contractor has to install what is shown on the spec and drawings for the price in the BQ.

If there are discrepancies between Drawings / Specs and BQ (quantities or descriptions) there is no adjustment to the Contract sum (plus or minus)

That said if there are changes between the “Contract drawings” and the ”For Construction Drawings” only the differences between the two sets are measured and valued using appropriate BQ unit rates

The VO issuing the “for construction” drawings is the only VO that needs to be issued

2) Provisional Quantities within Lump Sum Contracts

In the case of SRJ the following sections are noted in the LOA as Provisional Quantities

a) Plumbing pipework and fittings

b) ACV pipework and fittings

c) ACV ductwork and fittings

These provisional quantities are to be re-measured jointly between LSI, GRU and Ssangyong using the Beca “for construction” drawings and the standard method of measurement bound into the contract

The actual types of pipe / duct and fittings will be measured and the appropriate unit rate in the BQ will be applied to the agreed quantities

The Provisional quantities in the BQ will be deleted

The only VO that needs to be issued is the one covering the issue of the “for construction” drawings

This approach only applies to items that are notated as “Provisional” in the contract BQ or the LOA

I list below a number of examples of the above for guidance of the team

EXAMPLES

A) RE-MEASURABLE CONTRACT

If Re-measurable the quantities in the BQ are the basis of the contract

The entire works should be re-measured and priced at BQ rates and the result replaces the quantities and price in the BQ

1. Tender drawings show item but item not in Bill, and construction drawings show same quantity with tender drawing without any changes.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced – these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

2. Tender drawings didn’t show the item but Bills show some quantity. The construction drawings show different quantity to Bills.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case nil)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

3. Tender drawings show item but the item is not in construction drawings. Bills show the quantity.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case nil)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

4. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 12 nos. and the construction drawings show 10 nos.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case 10 nos)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

5. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 8 nos, and the construction drawings show 10 nos.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case 10 nos)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

6. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 8 nos, and the construction drawings show 7 nos.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case 7 nos)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

7. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 0 nos , and the construction drawings show 12 nos.

Quantities shown on “for con” drawings are measured and priced ( in this case 12 nos)– these replace quantities and rates in the BQ

B) LUMP SUM CONTRACT

If a Lump Sum contract the quantities in the BQ have no contractual significance and the contract sum is deemed to be based on drawings and specs

If there are changes the value of the works should be adjusted by measuring the only the difference between tender / contract drawings and the “For Con” drawings

1. Tender drawings show item but the item is not in Bill, and construction drawings show same quantity with tender drawing without any changes.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract . If there is no change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings then there is no variation or adjustment to the contract sum (regardless if there are any quantities in the BQ or not)

2. Tender drawings didn’t the show the item but Bills show some quantity. The construction drawings show different quantity to Bills.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract . If there is a change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings then that difference is a variation and adjustment to the contract sum is applicable (regardless of the quantities in the BQ)

3. Tender drawings show the item but the item is not in construction drawings. Bills show the quantity.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract .In this case there is a change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings (the work has been deleted) so the difference is a variation and adjustment to the contract sum is applicable (negative) (regardless of the quantities in the BQ)

4. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 12 nos. and the construction drawings show 10 nos.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract . If this case there is no change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings - So no adjustment to the contract sum is applicable (regardless of the quantities in the BQ)

5. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 8 nos, and the construction drawings show 10 nos.

6. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 8 nos, and the construction drawings show 7 nos.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract .In this case there is a change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings (the work has been reduced by 3 no) and that difference is a variation and adjustment to the contract sum is applicable (negative 3 nos) (regardless of the quantities in the BQ)

7. Tender drawings show 10 nos but tender bill shows 0 nos , and the construction drawings show 12 nos.

Quantities shown on “tender / contract ” drawings are the basis of the contract .In this case there is a change between “tender/contract” drawings and “for con” drawings (the work has been increased by 2 nos) and that difference is a variation and adjustment to the contract sum is applicable (additional 2 nos) (regardless of the quantities in the BQ)

C) LUMP SUM CONTRACT BUT PROVISIONAL QUANTITY (AS SRJ)

If the item or group of items in a Lump Sum Contract BQ or LOA are noted “Provisional” then those items (and only those items) should be treated as re-measurable (see Items A1-7 above)

Hope this helps

Regards

Steve Osborne

Langdon & Seah